|
|
|
|
|
by Grustaf
663 days ago
|
|
I responded to this:
> neither of those has “the” as part of its official name which is clearly untrue. Yes, there are two Congos. Both of them have "the" in their official name: -République du Congo (The smaller one, with Brazzaville) -République démocratique du Congo (The larger one, with Kinchasa) It is true that the official "Republic of the Congo" is typically shortened to just Congo" in everyday speech, my original point was just that there is nothing "racist" or colonial about say "The Congo". It is not called that as a slur because it's somehow lesser than e.g. Namibia, it is just that it's named after the Congo river. But I have heard many people who like to be offended have a vague idea that the "the" is somehow offensive because most countries don't have it. |
|
As regards the river basin. When applied to the respective countries individually (and without the "Republic of" qualifier), which are after all the context we're talking about here (not the river basin) it has an entirely different connotation. And again, there's simply no modern use case for "The Congo", by itself, as a name for either of these countries.
Whatsoever.