[andyjda]

I see this pattern a lot, and I find it telling:

- someone claims that Gen AI is overhyped

- someone responds with a Gen AI-enabled service that is

    1) really impressive

    2) is currently offered pretty much for free

    3) doesn't have that many tangible benefits.

There's many technologies for which it's very easy to answer "how does it improve life of an average person": the desktop, the internet, the iPhone. I don't think Udio is anything like these. Long-term, how profitable do you expect a Udio-like application to be? Who would pay money to use this service?

It's just hard to imagine how you can turn this technology into a valuable product. Which isn't to say it's impossible: gen-AI is definitely quite capable and people are learning how to integrate it into products that can turn a profit. But @futureshock's point was that it is the AI investment bubble that's losing hype, and I think that's inevitable: people are realizing there are many issues with a technology that is super impressive but hard to productize.