|
|
|
|
|
by justin66
661 days ago
|
|
> It seems like such a system (even every 2 or 5 years) would result in major reductions in accidents and injuries I bet such a system's impact would be vanishingly small and the money would be better spent elsewhere. Certainly not "major reductions." I'm not sure it's a terrible idea - we're bringing cars in for emissions checks anyway so sure, check the seatbelts for some reason - but let's not pretend it's going to do much. It would be strange but weirdly reassuring to learn that almost all auto accidents are not caused by carelessness, recklessness, drunkenness, impatience and general incompetence. That they are caused by... neglect of routine maintenance. That would be very far from the world we are living in. |
|
The second order effect might be very strong.
That being said, this will never happen because in America without a car you (avg. american) lose nearly all your ability to contribute to the economy and navigate your surroundings. We can barely align on taking licenses away from people who kill pedestrians in direct fault accidents [1]
1. https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/friends-identify-v...