|
|
|
|
|
by robertlagrant
666 days ago
|
|
> Plus the fairly unsolved waste storage problem. I don't think it is unsolved, is it? > Fukushima, 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl were existential for the nuclear industry. Like it or lump it, they made nuclear feel less safe. I don't think Fukushima made nuclear feel less safe. The terrible reporting and existing mindsets might have, but how could a single death when a tsunami hits a reactor make people feel unsafe in and of itself? |
|
If they're lying/mistaken about stuff obvious to scientists half a globe away then who can you trust with nuclear?
edit to add some sources to back up this third hand anecdote:
https://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/communicating-science/
> The government was telling us nothing. TEPCO [Tokyo Electric Power Co., operator of the plant] was telling us nothing. We had very little input from the scientific community in Japan. Here we are trying to figure this out, and we had first one, then two, then three explosions.”
Fackler had to talk with scientists overseas to learn that what he had witnessed were likely hydrogen explosions, which probably meant partial meltdowns of the affected reactors. “But when we reported this, we had so much criticism from the Japanese side for using the word ‘meltdown,’ ” he said.