Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by suraj_sindhia 671 days ago
IMO negative of negative is a less efficient comm strategy. For example, I'd word this as US Judge allows workers to compete with ex-employers or something similar.
1 comments
GeneralMayhem 671 days ago
No, it's a triple-negative. Judge struck down (1) ban (2) on non-(3) competes.

As a result of this ruling, non-competes are now enforceable; workers are not allowed to compete with ex-employers.

link
onlyrealcuzzo 671 days ago
On the Federal level.

If you live in a state that banned non-competes (California, Illinois, etc), your employer can try to sue you, but it won't go anywhere.

link
toomuchtodo 671 days ago
https://eig.org/state-noncompete-map/

Most surprising: Oklahoma and North Dakota have full bans. TIL.

link