|
|
|
|
|
by solardev
667 days ago
|
|
I don't understand your threat model: > This would ensure scammers can't just go in and edit the html on the fly How would the scammers "edit the HTML on the fly" of a bank's website that they don't control...? If they can control it somehow (either via a hack, local malware, browser extension, or just hand-editing the site on the victim's computer)... well, they can just as easily replace your PNG with one of their own, or just replace it with regular HTML numbers. If someone can control the bank website, it's game over. It's not a matter of graphics vs text? |
|