|
|
|
|
|
by rjst01
661 days ago
|
|
Yes - but as this is a purpose-designed protocol for display transport over thunderbolt, I would expect it to perform better than a remote desktop solution intended to go over a potentially low-bandwidth network. In the past I've found that using RDP to a VM running on localhost can actually perform better than the console provided by the VMM, but it's still not close to the experience of using the OS natively. I would expect this to be a lot closer. |
|
> A decade ago, Intel showed off something very similar: a 10Gbit Ethernet-over-Thunderbolt demonstration called Thunderbolt Networking. This is a faster version, an Intel representative said via email. Thunderbolt Share uses up to a 20Gbps connection over Thunderbolt 4 with low latency
> Essentially, you’re performing a local, cabled version of Microsoft’s Remote Desktop without all of the setup.
I don't think there's any reason yet to believe that this isn't just a proprietary (or possibly even just embedded VNC) screen sharing solution that's tweaked for a high-bandwidth low latency connection.
macOS has a "high performance mode" for its regular screen sharing (as of v14, Sonoma) which works amazingly well even over wired Gigabit ethernet.