[pjc50]

OK, fine, we can solve this with the informational equivalent of the Proposition 65 notice: "this content is the result of an LLM. It may contain falsehoods or libels. You are prohibited from relying on this information, and if you republish it you assume liability for any falsehoods".

(remember the Java license clause about not using it for nuclear reactors?)

Maybe we need a Data Protection Act adjustment: before using an LLM, the individual entering the prompt needs to be registered as a data controller, and needs to secure the consent of all individuals whose names appear in the LLM data?