[pdimitar]

> They only fall down hard when used in spaghetti dumpster fire codebases where you have to paste the contents of 6+ files into context or the code crosses a multiple service boundaries to do anything.

So humans do better than them in at least 80% of all code everywhere, if not 95% even? Cool, good to know.

Care to provide some examples to back your otherwise extraordinary claim btw?

[CuriouslyC]

You sure seem invested in hating AI, what's your problem brother?

[pdimitar]

I don't "hate" AI because (1) AI does not exist so how can I hate something that doesn't exist? And (2) I don't "hate" a machine, I cringe at people who make grand claims with zero proof. Yes. Zero. Not small, not infinitesimal -- zero.

I just can't make peace with the fact that I inhabit the same planet as people who can't make elementary distinctions.

[CuriouslyC]

I can't make peace that I'm on the same planet as people who can't use google worth a shit: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-generative...

And yet somehow want to act high and mighty and be insulting as fuck.

[pdimitar]

You failed to mention the word "can", which is a theoretical.

We can all Google stuff because internet is big and supports anyone's views, which means it's more important than ever to be informed and be able to infer well. Something that you seem to want to defer to sources that support your beliefs. Not nice finding that on a hacker forum but statistical outliers exist.

Live long and prosper. And be insulted, I suppose.

[krfrewH]

You are stealing and laundering my open source code and take the credit, that is the problem.

Fortunately, as pdimitar pointed out, so far it is an ineffective scam that mostly produces LoC.