[ben_w]

I've noticed the same. I think the actual reason behind is similar in both cases, something like "this is theft because it means I won't get paid" — which isn't really how that works but also explains Musk's X advertising lawsuit.

Like your respondant, I find the artists more sympathetic despite finding the argument itself bad.

[spondylosaurus]

I don't know if "theft because I'm not getting paid" describes artists' sentiment so much as "theft because someone else is making money on a tool that's 'using' my work/labor". Which I still think is an argument that requires opening a Pandora's box of IP law that should not be opened (because in the long run it won't benefit non-corporate artists anyway), but...

[ronsor]

In general, I think the coming replacement of many jobs is a serious issue for society and one that deserves serious attention.

That said, the intellectually dishonest arguments irk me to no end and I'm simply tired of them. The artists upset over AI are more sympathetic than the RIAA (It's really quite hard not to be), but this stuff really wears at my sympathy.

And, unfortunately, it's impossible to actually tackle any issues unless without moving past the bad arguments.

[ben_w]

> That said, the intellectually dishonest arguments irk me to no end and I'm simply tired of them.

I, too, get annoyed by People Who Are Wrong On The Internet; I'm trying to become more stoic, as I don't want to end up like my father.

I don't know if this will pass, or if the pro/anti AI split is going to be as permanent as the economic left/right split, or the libertarian/authoratarian split.