|
|
|
|
|
by nine_zeros
661 days ago
|
|
> So the problem is that the one button is buried under stacks and frameworks multiple layers deep. Is it a failure of management to consider a single button change an easy task when it should, in fact, be an easy task? This is a great example. Why? Because you called out complexity. Specifically, that an engineering org should try to minimize complexity. And yet, the framework for adding a button is immensely complex. Why? Because management wanted a "complexity" aspect for the button framework project. Without the "complexity" aspect, the engineer on it wouldn't get a promo and management wouldn't get additional headcount for their own promo. > And the guy that they fired (possibly for good cause) Likely fired to serve a stack rank. Someone had to fall at the bottom in Q2 2022. Unfortunately their exact context and expertise is required in Q2 2024 and the backfill just doesn't have 5 years with our complex button framework yet. I am sorry. Devs cannot be blamed for poor management practices such as "complexity" and "stack ranking". |
|