[tmpz22]

> To me, it just means "keep all the code in one repo, instead of trying to split things up into different repos."

To me, and perhaps more from a Devops-like perspective, mono repo means "one repo many diverse deployment environments and artifacts often across multiple programming languages".

Im advocating against the Google/Stripe situation of a singular massive repo with complex build tools to make it function - like Bazel. I think sometimes small organizations get lured by ego and bad cost/benefit analysis into implementing such an architecture and it can tank entire product orgs in my experience (obviously not for Stripe, Google, etc.).

[jvolkman]

A monorepo doesn't require multiple programming languages or Bazel. But once multiple programming languages are involved, the complexity exists regardless of the chosen tooling. With multiple repos, that complexity is just pushed elsewhere like the CI system.