[gruez]

>Ok, I was just providing a link for you.

And if you read my last comment more carefully, I wasn't faulting you, only the original characterization.

>If you wanted to discuss whether cheating is good in this specific scenario, you should have put that as your comment to the parent.

I think it's fair game to call the claim misleading, even if the parents are technically protesting for the right to cheat, for the reasons outlined in my previous comment. Again, going back to the example of democrats being against voter ID law, it would be misleading to characterize that as "democrats protesting for the right to commit vote fraud", even though they're technically supporting making election fraud easier.

[bradjohnson]

Ok sounds good