[stale2002]

> of how there is systemic illegal behaviour

I didn't say anything about illegality.

Dictatorships can be perfectly legal. Especially if a court says so.

And, given the fact that this is about the judicial branch taking dictatorial actions, almost by definition anything that they decide or choose to do would be legal (As the judicial branch is the one that decides in the first place if its legal or not!)

[tankenmate]

But judges can only interpret the law (legally), they can't author the law. If they are taking dictatorial action that implies executive action, which is not within their remit in most countries (even including most non democracies). If a court issues an order it is up the the executive to enforce that order (for example an arrest warrant). So then to your argument, it would have to be more than the judicial branch in order to be dictatorial, it would also require at a minimum non opposition from the executive, or more likely cooperation.

And so, where is the evidence? Even 3 high impact examples would suffice as a starting point.

[EDIT]; typo fix