[oscarlevin]

They may be useless to you (although I think even seeing examples of types of questions that can be asked serves a purpose), but the book was not written only for you. I think it is reasonable for books to have features that are useful for students in courses that assign a grade, as well as other features that are useful for students using it for self study.

It is also worth pointing out, that at least for math textbooks, there is never an expectation that a student should solve all the exercises. If you solve those that do have a solution, then you will hopefully still have a good experience and learn lots.

[soul_grafitti]

I've been using textbooks to learn things for over 50 years and during my development writing code many (most?) of those times was not in the context of a classroom but in the context of needing to understand something so I could write code to do it. For folks in this situation having answers, especially to some complex problems, is a huge benefit in terms of gaining understanding and saving time.

I don't think I'm alone here when I say I frequently gain understanding of things by writing code to model them. I know I understand something when I can write it in code. So after ingesting the lesson about a topic I'll see if I can write code to do what I just learned. I have spent a lot of hours stuck at a juncture of not being entirely sure my code, which works on the simple examples, is also working in the complex ones. The difference in results may not be evident. Am I troubleshooting my understanding or my code? I need a known result to actually know.

This is one place being able to copy something from your textbook, for example, paste it into ChatGPT and ask questions is a huge benefit. ChatGippity doesn't always get it right but usually the interchange is much more useful than being stuck.