|
|
|
|
|
by ChocolateGod
668 days ago
|
|
I believe they're referring to the tone of language used, which is IMHO just unnecessarily rude. > THIS is why your software is slow. it's not "web tech" or "electron" or "JIT compilation" or any fucking sorting algorithm > it's boneheaded _design decisions_ made to avoid doing things properly in packages with 1,600,000 weekly downloads. > :DDDDDDDDDD this is why everyone hates nodejs developers Yes, you can criticise a piece of software for doing something X way, but you don't have to shit on the people who made it in the process. Imagine being the person who implemented this waking up and seeing that. |
|
The entire point everyone is making is that this ISN'T about some fine point. This is a completely stupid approach. It should offend anyone on first sight or thought. There is no valid way to think up this idea for this way to get this result, and not immediately discard it as ridiculous.
If you're brainstorming initially for possible ways to get from your house to the one across the street, sure maybe one of the possible ways is to give yourself some minor injury, call an ambulance, go to the hospital, and then give them the other address when they take you back home (setting aside thatthey don't take you back home, let's pretend they do). But you don't actually do it. You reject that idea as outlandish and crazy.
Even IF it worked fine. Maybe you can't actually successfully get an ambulance to function as a taxi, but Uber will just fine. It would outwardly function just fine to call uber to take from one address to another. Yet you still do not use that approach to that problem. You consider it for one second and conclude that that would be outlandish and crazy. Just utterly gross and stupid and fucking inexcusably so.