The article opens with a standard trope of "the generations after me are bad" and builds their arguments from there. Not sure much value should be placed on this article
The only mention of generations in the article comes from an initial quote, which describes how the quoted party has anecdotally experienced many of a specific generation wanting to climb the seniority ladder in a very quick time.
The rest of the article then goes on to explore what the depth of knowledge and maturity of behaviour should preferably be for anyone claiming to be a senior engineer.
It does so without ever referencing generations again.
The rest of the article then goes on to explore what the depth of knowledge and maturity of behaviour should preferably be for anyone claiming to be a senior engineer.
It does so without ever referencing generations again.
I think this is a worthwhile read.