|
|
|
|
|
|
by ben_w
672 days ago
|
|
|
> I can find evidence that it has an IQ of around 124 Despite me being someone who is generally impressed by the best LLMs, I think this says more about IQ tests than it does any AI. Which isn't to shame those tests — we made those tests for humans, we were the only intelligence we knew of that used complex abstract language and tools until about InstructGPT — but it does mean we should reconsider what we mean by "intelligence". My gut feeling is that a better measure is how fast we learn stuff. Computers have a speed advantage because transistors outpace synapses by the degree to which a pack of wolves outpaces continental drift (yes I did do the calculation), so what I mean here is how many examples rather than how many seconds. But as I say, gut feeling — this isn't a detailed proposal for a new measure, it likely needs a lot of work to even turn this into something that can be a good measure. |
|
|