|
|
|
|
|
by VonGallifrey
670 days ago
|
|
> But it seems you've cited an example of something ironically very anti-labor. This means your government has codified into law the false idea that all human employees are undifferentiated commodities (like cattle). So as an employer, if there's no ability to remove underperformers every year No, that is not the case. You can still fire people and you can do so especially if they are underperforming. You just can't do it as a mass layoff. If you fire someone then you need a reason to do so. If you fire people because of a layoff then you need to show that the layoff is legitimate. You can not just group underperformers and let them go as a layoff because you are circumventing labor law. You can not lie about the reason why you are letting someone go. No one would care if you fired 99% of your company IF you are prepared to show they were underperforming and that was the official reason given. |
|
Show me examples of firing a few underperformers easily from a company.