Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by LeafItAlone 673 days ago
> because the scam victim would be a honeypot most of the time

The pool of potential victims is the entire population with a bank account, meaning at least the majority of adults. The percentage that would fall of it and agree is certainly not 100%, but it is definitely higher than I personally expected years ago. That still results in a ton of possible victims.

Give such a large pool, how can a police honeypot be the scam victim “most of the time”?

1 comments

Scammers need to reach the victim somehow. How they do this currently is either robocalls (call every single potential number in a loop), social media or advertising.

If every disconnected number leads to a police-run honeypot that would play along (easy with the carriers' cooperation), police running bait social media accounts to get scammers to approach them, and proactively crawling scam-prone keywords for any scam ads to follow up on, the scammers will likely all get arrested before they'd even reach a single real victim.

Most importantly, the mere fact this is happening would have a deterrent effect and effectively put a stop to such scam operations because even ignoring the risk of arrest, it's simply not profitable if the majority of your scam attempts go to law enforcement who simply wastes your time.