|
|
|
|
|
by bick_nyers
671 days ago
|
|
I disagree. I have to learn by committing to muscle memory. I always say I'm a slow learner, but a fast thinker. Yes, I can read/hear a concept and understand it in abstract and visualize it pretty easily, but it will leave my brain just as easily as it entered. Just the way my memory works. Solved problems speeds up that muscle memory learning process significantly as opposed to going line by line and attempting to generate your own problems/solutions. In addition, you can solve a problem correctly, but not have the correct prose, solution manuals can help there as well. Edit: Honestly the biggest thing about solving problems is that it gives a sense of progression and a dopamine-reward loop that most people just don't get from reading one line at a time. That being said, good problems and good solutions can be time consuming to generate, so it makes total sense to me that the PhD-level textbooks don't follow that format. |
|
completely agree. I would recommend checking out mathacademy.com. I've been using it the last two months to raise my skill levels in math and its been a great investment of my time. It gives you a short lesson on the topic and then just gives you problem sets to burn though. what I like about it is that you don't think about your learning objectives. I just log in every day and do the problem sets and lessons until I feel like I did enough for the day. repeat everyday and you'll just naturally find yourself improving.