Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sylware 667 days ago
I severely disagree, this is quite short sighted.

The obscene complexity of the rust language (like c++) makes a toolchain beyond anything reasonable to code alternatives: that reason alone is sufficient to avoid it.

You can have as many "features" you want, the anti-feature of absurd/grotesque syntax complexity _alone_ buries it.

There is nothing more to say or argue about. This is dead simple.

1 comments

We will have to agree to disagree, then.
Indeed, but with a major difference:

Your side has a significantly higher cost technical dependency than we don't have.