[stonethrowaway]

It’s an allegorical painting by Rembrandt, nothing more.

[popalchemist]

Statements that end in "nothing more" are almost always incorrect. The only way one could make such a statement with total certitude would be to be omniscient, as the phrase implies an exhaustive understanding of all possible facts.

[stonethrowaway]

Yeah because Rembrandt had all the facts on Aristotle. Spitting image of the chap that painting.

[kbelder]

But he certainly may have more knowledge on Aristotle than you.