[rozap]

Congrats, and it seems to work well. It gives similar ratings to the ratings my grocery store has on the product.

What's the rationale behind the ratings it gives to different categories? Some are obvious, like "Sugar is bad", but other things are less clear, like Graham Flour is rated as a "good" ingredient - why is that? I know citation of sources is hard with AI but it's pretty useful here.

Also, I know this is a hard thing to solve (AI or not...) since opinion on an ingredient being good or bad shifts like the wind and with how much money is pushing it. I remember when coffee was good, then it caused cancer, then heart attacks, but now I think it is good again, or at least it only causes cancer to Californians, or something?

[pkaye]

California does maintain a list of prop 65 chemicals so you can compare against that list.

https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65/proposition-65-list