|
|
|
|
|
|
by kornhole
677 days ago
|
|
|
1. This is not run by Alex Jones, but to answer your question, I trust very little. Alex Jones is more trustworthy than most mainstream media. He voices much opinion and speculation, but he and his crew do not lie to manipulate us into war. 2. International observers oversaw the election and determined the elections to be free and fair. You are free to deny election results, but you should provide some kind of evidence to back your claims that it was unfair in some way. |
|
|
He voices much opinion and speculation, but he and his crew do not lie to manipulate us into war.
Instead they lie and manipulate us (some of us, anyway) into accepting Putin's narratives as to how the war started, and into an eventual settlement favorable to his demands. And into believing that nearly everyone in the occupied regions happily voted to be reabsorbed into the Motherland. In an election that was of course free and fair, and overseen by international "observers".
International observers oversaw the election and determined the elections to be free and fair.
Not from any major organizations that usually see to these things, such as the OSCE or the Council of Europe.
Instead -- it's not surprising that the sham referendum also had sham "observers". Here's a report from one who deeply regrets having taken part, saying he felt used by the Russians, and that "I was so naive as to think I could separate the technical aspects of vote counting from the political dimensions of the situation":
https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/deutscher-beobachtete-sc...
You are free to deny election results, but you should provide some kind of evidence to back your claims that it was unfair in some way.
So what is your explanation as to why no government on the planet, besides North Korea, has stepped forward the recognize the results of these so-called "referendums"?