|
|
|
|
|
by craigyk
5108 days ago
|
|
Yes, it is smart. On many levels, even the long run. I think you might not be aware that a very large percentage of drugs in the West emerge from publicly funded research... sometimes even 'basic science' research. While pharma does do its own R&D, it mostly just farms promising leads from academic research. Where they do shell out big bucks is in the cost of performing clinical trials. This is a regulatory cost. While I think trials are a critical step, I'd be surprised if costs here couldn't come down substantially through means that don't involve R&D. Maybe India could offer something in this regard? India's pharma companies might be a lot more 'innovative' if their academic science and government spending on science were stronger. This might just be a matter of time. Finding a different way of manufacturing a drug can be very innovative work. Trust me, the chemists that come up with these organic syntheses all too often consider themselves geniuses. |
|