Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dadver 667 days ago
If I'm understanding the article correctly, re: (2), the 'contract' was between Disney and the widower husband (Piccolo), not the deceased (Tangsuan). Disney claims he (Piccolo) must abide by Disney+ ToS and arbitrate while his defense argues he's a plaintiff for the deceased's estate and not representing himself.
1 comments

Thank you, I misunderstood that. It still doesn't make it morally right, though.