[refurb]

The case at hand for the SCOTUS decision itself?

If I'm remembering correctly, the issue was that fishing regulations morphed into requiring boats that someone be onboard to monitor, and the entire cost of that was borne by the fishermen.

None of that was actually a part of the law, it was just a fever dream by a bureaucrat. What started out as “a law to regulate fishing” morphed into a new tax on fishing, and most importantly one that can’t be challenged for reasonableness in the courts.

Seems pretty reasonable to require Congress to pass a law that at least lays out the rough boundaries of the proposed regulations?