|
|
|
|
|
by jcims
668 days ago
|
|
>Chasing biologically-inspired rabbits, such as STDP and LIF (see paper above/wikipedia), does seem to be a waste of time Unless physiological compatibility with a biological brain is considered an interesting endpoint? If you think about Neuralink for example, wouldn’t it be interesting if our brains could directly engage the model? Not just a translation layer but perceive it directly and natively though some kind of synaptic modem that converts analog exchanges of neurotransmitters to the synthetic network in the digital domain. |
|
Excellent point. I am focused entirely on synthetic simulations without biological integration (for now).
I think that could be an interesting next step - determining a way to modify a SNN that was trained in a synthetic time domain such that it can process real time signals. Training these things online is not really an option. You have to run a large # of offline simulations before you can find the right networks. Learning rules like STDP could theoretically address the online learning problem, but I couldn't find any traction down that path yet.