[roryokane]

Even though the intent is to make the screenshot look more professional, there is a flaw that makes the result look unprofessional. The flaw is that the text in the title bar and the location bar isn't rendered as it would be on a Mac. See the difference in this reference screenshot I found: http://macamour.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/safari4_....

Here are the problems with the text rendering that I could spot:

• The current text has too much hinting and not enough anti-aliasing. Use different font smoothing settings in whatever code you're using to overlay the text.

• The font appears to be Aktiv Grotesk, but should be Lucida Grande.

• The baseline of the URL text is not aligned with the baseline of "Google" in the search bar.

On the other hand, the light-gray-shadow embedding effect of the title looks good.

As a side note, the explanatory text has very many small grammar and capitalization errors. Getting the text revised by a friend might help. But it's not too bad, because the controls are really all you need to use the site, and the controls are explained pretty clearly.

Also, I like the fact that you give default values for everything, so you can see exactly how the app works without digging around for an image.

[ksat]

* I'll see what I can do. * I am using Lucida Grande, but it needs to be installed on the machine. * Should I move it down like 2 pixles? Seems fine on my machine though

Thanks for the feedback. I am not english native - ran the blog through a online-grammer-checker something and it said everything is fine :)

[veemjeem]

Would the average person who prefers "professional" screenshots be able to tell the difference between Aktiv Grotesk and Lucida Grande? You have a sharp eye, but I would think 99.9% of the population looking at these screenshots would not complain about Aktiv Grotesk.

[roryokane]

Actually, from looking at the generated image, I was only able to tell that the font looked vaguely "wrong". I found out it was specifically Aktiv Grotesk only by going through many steps on Identifont: http://www.identifont.com/identify?22+%20+9J+39+1R6+26RB+4PW....

But still, I agree that most people would probably not notice the font being off at all. And the font smoothing difference jumps out at me the most; if the use of Aktiv Grotesk was the only difference from real Safari, I might not have noticed anything.