[culi]

There's a lot more to a browser than the JS engine. And in general, we would want all of the browsers JS engines to be essentially the same. I think starting with an existing engine is the most logical approach

[akira2501]

> we would want all of the browsers JS engines to be essentially the same

You say until there is a CVE found.

[abhinavk]

True but at this point of time, Firefox and Servo are using the same CSS engine, same JS engine and same compositor and rendering engine.

[fabrice_d]

That still leaves you with at least the layout engine, all the DOM apis, all the networking, multi process model & sandboxing, web extensions support, that are different implementations.

[tvshtr]

They plan to abstract it (work is underway) to make it even possible to use chromium's js engine. https://www.phoronix.com/news/Servo-JavaScript-Engine-Modula...

[culi]

Interesting. Kinda reminds me of the 360 Safe browser that's one of the most popular browsers used in China. It can render a website using WebKit, Blink, or Trident (Internet Explorer)

[niutech]

It's not about including multiple web engines (like e.g. Sleipnir does) but multiple JS engines in a single web engine.