|
|
|
|
|
by jawns
671 days ago
|
|
You're right, it's not relevant to their abilities. It's relevant to the historical opportunities that such companies have had available to them. Likely, the thinking was, "We know that in the past such firms have experienced disadvantages. In years past, bias and discrimination against them may have hurt their chances of procuring a contract like this. Recognizing that historical disadvantage, we now want to give such firms opportunities to show the world that they are every bit as capable." |
|
But we don't. We just use our work and our reputation.
There's no "historical disadvantage" for a company that supports the hacker community to be full off all sorts of eccentric, non-conforming people.