[AlbertCory]

> Maybe I misinterpreted but the implication is I could run something from the early 00s without changes

Yes, you did. If he meant that, he wasn't thinking. Some piece of your hardware won't work with the old software, unless it's also old. You get a new printer and there are no drivers for the old OS. The old software won't work with the new network. You want some new app and it doesn't work with the old software. Etc. Etc.

We ran into this in Google Patent Litigation all the time. You have to have old everything to run old software, whether your license is still good or not.

But I think we agree that paying for maintenance only, and no new features, is fair. Of course, most vendors don't want to do that; they want to shove new "features" down your throat.

[ghaff]

When I worked for an enterprise Linux vendor, we definitely provided long-term support/maintenance options followed by security patches. It was mostly for government-related but also for some companies, especially those that were using it for embedded applications. But we also had meetings with those customers regularly who certainly weren't just installing the software and not touching it for 10+ years.

I've also known customers who have old software, e.g. for test systems, just running on old systems who basically don't breathe on the ancient systems. For years, United's entertainment system would also sometimes reboot to a 20+ year-old pre-Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel but that's not really a critical system.

[AlbertCory]

"don't breathe on it" is right.

I always think of the John Mellencamp line, "That's O.K., I knew this would happen

But I was hopin' not today"

https://genius.com/John-mellencamp-im-not-running-anymore-ly...

[exe34]

have you guys never heard of virtualisation, wine, etc?

[AlbertCory]

There were these two clean-cut young men in short-sleeved white shirts and ties who came to my door and handed me a pamphlet. I think it was about that.