|
|
|
|
|
by mynameisvlad
720 days ago
|
|
You're asking for... what? For the secretary to be liable because a random car they have never seen or interacted with broke a law? How is that in any way shape or form reasonable? And why would anybody ever sign that contract except under duress or exceptional circumstances when they can get a job... literally anywhere else? And even if that was a viable approach right now, the point of AI/self-driving technology is that the number of cars will vastly outnumber the number of employees once fully deployed and not in limited pilot programs. |
|
It's his main task, like any driver, just he has to pay attention to less things than a standard ride, since he has a very smart car (like when you sit in a Tesla with FSD).
Just he is not sitting in the car, instead in his office or home.