|
|
|
|
|
by tsimionescu
679 days ago
|
|
Sure, but people still need to test things, and HTTPS greatly complicates things. Browsers' refusal to make it poasible to run anything unencrypted when you know what you're doing is extremely annoying, and has caused significant losses of productivity throughout the industry. If they're so worried about users getting duped to activate the insecure mode, they could at least make it a compiler option and provide an entirely separate download in a separate place. Also, don't get me started on HSTS and HSTS preloading making it impossible to inspect your own traffic with entities like Google. It's shameful that Firefox is even more strict about this idiocy than Chrome. |
|
Whose computer is this? I guess the machine I purchased doesn't belong to me, but instead belongs to the developer of the browser, who has absolutely no idea what I'm trying to do, what my background is and qualifications and what my needs are? It seems absurd to give that person the ultimate say over me on my system, especially if they're going to give me some BS about protecting me from myself for my own good or something like that. Yet, that is clearly the direction things are headed.