|
|
|
|
|
by fsflover
671 days ago
|
|
> because servers are mostly operated by people with the discipline and skill not to add some random site to their package manager. I have the discipline and skill. I want to be able to run what I want. I don't need "help" from Apple. You will always have a choice of not installing an alternative app store, just like on Android. > If normal people ran Linux, they’d be just as prone to run “sudo add-apt-repository“ as they are clicking through the Windows prompts now. I installed GNU/Linux for my relatives, and they never did that in years. |
|
This might even be true but that just means you aren’t the target market. Nobody is stopping you from running a full open source stack but I don’t think it should come as a surprise that 99% of the people using computers pick something easier and safer to use when it’s not your job or hobby. My Linux desktop experience goes back to 1994 and while it’s a lot better now I still have zero trouble understanding that trade off.
> I installed GNU/Linux for my relatives, and they never did that in years.
Again, think mainstream. Where that’s happened historically was most server-side stuff because Linux has much greater share there, but most of the business compromising users is focused on Windows, Android, iOS, and maybe macOS because that’s where almost all of the people they’ll make money from are. If desktop Linux became more popular, attackers would spend time on it and would have comparable success rates – likely even higher due to how far behind the Linux world is compared to macOS on sandboxing and code signing. Free software is a great thing but it doesn’t have magic pixie dust obviating the need to spend time on security like everyone else.