|
|
|
|
|
|
by cloudsec9
675 days ago
|
|
|
> sole supplier
> free market I'm sensing some contradiction in that. Pricing and packaging parts in a way that ensures its cheaper to buy a different phone is the opposite of a free market.
Breaking your screen or wearing out your battery shouldn't mean you have to replace both, but it does if you own a Samsung and want genuine Samsung parts. Did this approach get disclosed when consumers bought the phones, or only when something happened? |
|
|
Is there some regulation forcing them to act in this manner?