|
|
|
|
|
by cowboyhero
5114 days ago
|
|
It's more likely that some of these are defensive applications, to lock competitors from getting them (eg: blog, tunes). Winer is right, and I'm surprised nobody is writing about this or calling much attention to it. There's enormous potential marketing value behind domains like "beatles.music" or "harrypotter.books" or "superman.movies". With the advertising and reach of companies like Amazon and Google (or even Warner and Sony), I think these new domains have the power to split the web, and potentially turn .com, .net, and .org into something of a ghetto (sorta similar to how .biz and .name might be viewed by Joe Consumer now). On the other hand, it may well be meaningless. I'm continually surprised to see big companies use facebook.com/[companyname] in their advertising too. |
|
But doesn't the current perception of those domains today indicate what we can expect from yet more gratuitous TLDs?
I had almost forgotten about those two TLDs, and can just imagine how a more casual Web user might think of them: not at all.
On the other hand, it may well be meaningless. I'm continually surprised to see big companies use facebook.com/[companyname] in their advertising too.
I find that to be a more disturbing trend.