Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rndmize 684 days ago
Huh? I don't see how MS has any blame in any of this. Client chooses not to upgrade systems. Client chooses to use crowdstrike as a vendor. Client chooses not to accept free support. At what point was MS supposed to do something here? There are loads of things to complain about or take issue with when it comes to MS, but I don't see how this is one of them.
2 comments

Essentially, he is stating being good at backward compatibility is the problem :-/
Comment seems to imply it's MS fault for maintaining backward compatibility