[dbdr]

Thanks for the research!

While I understand your point that Clauser doesn't precisely say "climate change doesn't exist", when he says "CO2 emissions are beneficial", that's widely against the large scientific consensus on climate change. So while the person you're replying to didn't go into details (like you did well) and could have phrased it slightly better, I don't think it was misleading either, and their larger point stands pretty much change unchanged. Do you feel differently, i.e. that it was significantly misleading?

[antonvs]

His "research" is nonsense. As he confessed himself, all he did was "a quick google" and asked chatgpt (?!!)

I've provide some references for what I wrote in this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41226789

Clauser is a climate change denier, by his own admission and based on the pseudoscientific claims he's made.

[claytongulick]

> Do you feel differently, i.e. that it was significantly misleading?

Nope, I felt it was imprecise.

[antonvs]

You were wrong.