Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by avidseeker 682 days ago
That's what I've always thought of Open Source... until I found out Open Source projects that are not in the spirit of Open Source. Signal is a big example of that. It's hostile to forks, didn't publish its source code for a year and doesn't have a good documentation.

Same thing for Nvidia, big browser projects like Chromium, and Android. Many Chromium forks died because they couldn't keep up with upstream, except for ungoogled-chromium.
1 comments
elviejo 682 days ago
That is why Free(dom) software is better than "open source".

Free software is committed to sharing values.

link
MrJohz 682 days ago
This is untrue. Both "free" and "open" licenses do the same thing in this context: they are legal documents that tell you what different parties are able to do with the code, but none of the licenses mandate how you run your project: whether you must accept contributions from others, whether you provide a bug tracker, or anything else like that.

Hell, you could have a GPL project that is developed entirely behind closed doors, as long as you always give users a copy of the source code when you release a new version.

link