[ggm]

I'd like a rational explanation of how the LLM interprets "don't hallucinate" -Is it perhaps "translated" internally to the functional equivalent of a higher confidence check on output?

Otherwise, I think it's baloney. I know there is not a simple linear mapping from plain english to the ML, but the typed word clearly is capable of being parsed and processed, its the "somehow" I'd like to understand better. What would this do the interpretation of paths through weights.

Pretty much 'citation needed'