Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lovethevoid 685 days ago
PrivacyGuides (not affiliated with them, just find it a useful resource), highlights Proton, Mullvad, and iVPN as reputable depending on your use. They state Proton does not support ipv6 yet, Mullvad removed remote port forwarding, and iVPN the same.

The recommendation the person you're responding to (PIA and Cryptostorm), is very untrustworthy and doesn't even match the minimum criteria from PrivacyGuides.

2 comments

Got any details, reference, quote, or analysis on the CS claim?

AFAICT, the only discriminating factor is lack of solicited third-party security audits. Which I don't think implies being "untrustworthy".

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/vpn/#marketing

https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/why-is-vpn-providers-lik...

(PIA/Kape I get and relevant information is easily discoverable available on controversy surrounding them and their owners)

The default state of vpn services should be that they're untrusted.
i mentioned pia cryptostorm etc (or whatever) in the context of onion plus vpn multihop.