|
|
|
|
|
by gruez
686 days ago
|
|
> but because that number is too round, too perfect Because it's an external estimate. From the article: "That number has been guesstimated at around ten percent of the workforce – about 12,500 people – as part of an effort to get the overall workforce from 120,000 to below 100,000." >while not even linking it to specific division within there's no indication that they decided to cut 10% (or whatever) evenly across all divisions. The only thing we do know is that the overall reduction is 10%. |
|