|
|
|
|
|
|
by jtbayly
684 days ago
|
|
|
The point is that Clorox cannot pay OpenAI anything. Marketing on your own site will have effects on an AI just like it will have an effect on a human reader. No disclosure is required because the context is explicit. But the moment OpenAI wants to charge for Clorox to show up more often, then it needs to be disclosed when it shows up. |
|
|
Yes, I agree with this. But what about paying a 3rd party to include your drivel in a training set, and that 3rd party pays OpenAI to include the training set in some fine tuning exercise? Does that legally trigger the need for disclosure? You aren't directly creating advertisements, you are increasing the probability that some word appears near some other word.