|
|
|
|
|
by ticoombs
680 days ago
|
|
It also proxies images, which I think is the actual reason (sic). So there is no way from a network point of view to disallow pornographic material on public access terminals. Though, I have not recently looked at how the other search engines do it. As a long time DDG user, the image filter isn't perfect and occasionally I'll see NSFW images even when I have safe search on. |
|
Apparently for Google it's done by aliasing www.google.* to forcesafesearch.google.com [1], or for DDG: safe.duckduckgo.com [2]
[1] https://www.draytek.co.uk/support/guides/kb-dns-safesearch [2] https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/features/safe-s...