[alexchamberlain]

I don't like that the homepage says "free, free, free", then reveals that it's charging recruiters. This is perfectly reasonable way to monetise, but it's not a free platform - it's a platform that charges the recruiters.

[dotty-]

To be fair, there is a "For Talents" and "For Recruiters" selector at the top of the page. For talents, it is a free platform.

[tavoyne]

That's because it's the most accurate way to phrase it for candidates. We also state clearly in the FAQ on the front page how we make money.

[repelsteeltje]

Sounds mostly like a regular job board, except the hard work of describing the job/vacancy is left to the candidate rather than the employer.

I somewhat dislike the idea that you're still essentially stuck with the recruiter in the middle. And I fear that like any other directory it quickly turns into a spam platform. Candidates bugged by unwanted phone calls, startups digging through piles of recommendations...

[tavoyne]

Have you checked the onboarding? It only asks for your preferences (specifically, type of contract, availability, salary, and location), not for a description of the job or vacancy.