[pessimizer]

You haven't heard people "knocking" about the widespread adoption of mail in paper ballots? They simply offer no protection against vote coercion which is not a good choice in any election of importance. Pretty sure at least one of the two parties has ending mail-in voting as a long-held position.

At the least, this will often result in heads of household voting for their entire families. At the most, it can result in people voting under the supervision of a local gang/militia member.

If anyone is looking for the right terminology to find papers, it's "no-receipt" voting. The holy grail is no-receipt, yet verifiable voting, but it might be mathematically impossible.