Excessive CO2 is pushing the only place where your species can live closer and closer to "no longer inhabitable" status
...then how many decades and $billions should you pour into a line of research which shows no signs of real-world utility, after 6+ decades and umpteem $billions of research?
You have finite resources
-and-
Excessive CO2 is pushing the only place where your species can live closer and closer to "no longer inhabitable" status
...then how many decades and $billions should you pour into a line of research which shows no signs of real-world utility, after 6+ decades and umpteem $billions of research?