[343rwerfd]

Lots and lots words flow about this. For me, it is very simple. LLMs do a complex process, quite analog to human thinking/understanding/speaking/writing, but they're doing all those - most probably - in an alternative way to what humans do in their brains.

Directly comparing LLM's outputs with human output is like comparing a F22 flying with an eagle flying. Both fly obviously, but using entirely different processes to do so (different requirements, capabilities, despite the simplest similarity of both systems - the eagle and the F22 - at "doing fly").

You don't automatically say "an eagle is more capable at flying than a F22, because it flies with very little energy requirements while deploying quite better, reliable take-off / landing capabilities".

You actually don't usually go comparing these systems just because both can fly.

but many out there are pulling their hair trying to compare side by side the obvious mathematical systems that LLMs are to - most probably again - the completely different in nature systems that humans are.